For Guainía never appears either in the statistics that are published in the press, or in the reports of the newscasters of radio and t.v. There is used an argument of population, of marketing, of importance and up to(even) of ignorance not to do it. Fundamental things for the nation have managed to ignore for this motive, or it(he,she) has left them so limited(small) space, that not to leave them anything it(he,she) had given the same thing.
When the governors' first elections were realized in the "new" departments, the information of the results was given succinct, as if they were not meaning anything. The majority of the newscasters did not even mention them. Few ones that did it limited themselves to reproducing the results of the registraduría to national level. The majority of the means studied and analyzed the results in Bogota and in the most populated departments, with his(its,her) capitals. As for Arauca, The Amazon, Vichada, San Andrés, Casanare, Caquetá, Putumayo and Guainía, only were published the names of the winners for governor and capital mayor, followed(consecutive) by his(its) quantity of votes and the percentage that they were representing. Little it(he,she) mattered that it was the first time that these societies and cultures were choosing to his(its,her) regional agents chief executive. An event very similar to the end(purpose) of a dictatorship in any country of the world was treated as a minor news, almost like a " not news event ".